Please comment using the text box* on any ethical and/or research governance issues, including:
Whether the proposed research is ethically acceptable
Any ethical issues that need separate consideration
Appropriateness of ethical review and research governance arrangements
Any potential adverse consequences for humans, animals or the environment and whether these risks have been addresses satisfactorily in the proposal
When you have completed your comments, select the “Save” option from the top of the screen.
Please remember to 'Save' text regularly to avoid loss of data.
*This
text box must be completed using:
No more than 4000 characters,
including spaces, tabs and character returns..
Only the standard Je-S character set should
be used.
Please comment using the text box* on the following assessment of the proposal:
Does the Applicant have (or are likely to have) a sound plan for managing the research data funded through the award, taking into account:
1. 1. The types, scale and complexity of data being (or to be) managed
2. 2. The likely long-term value for further research including by data share
3. 3. The anticipated information security and ethics requirements
Further guidance for Reviewers in assessing a Data Management Plan is available at: http://www.mrc.ac.uk/documents/pdf/data-management-plans-guidance-for-reviewers/
If there are no interests for you to declare, please type 'None' in the text box.
When you have completed your comments, select the 'Save' option from the top of the screen.
Please remember to save regularly to avoid loss of data.
*The
text box must be completed using:
No
more than 4000 characters, including spaces, tabs and returns.
Only
the standard Je-S
character set should be used.
For further information regarding Peer Review at the MRC, please see the MRC website https://mrc.ukri.org/funding/peer-review/
Future Leaders Fellowships
Ethics and Data Management
Comment on any ethical and/or research/innovation governance issues, including:
Whether the proposed research/innovation is ethically acceptable in relation to risks to humans, animals or the environment including the need to use animals and lack of realistic alternatives, evaluation of the scientific strength and weaknesses of proposals involving animal use, plans to obtain ethical approval from relevant body
Where applicable, whether the data management plan indicates the applicant has a sound plan for managing the data funded through the award and in the long-term including the methodologies for data collection/generation, storing and curating data, data repository and suitability for sharing
UKRI reviewer guidance and the specific assessment criteria for each scheme is available to view on the UKRI website https://www.ukri.org/funding/funding-opportunities/future-leaders-fellowships/
Reviewers are also encouraged to read the Peer Review Framework, which describes how peer review is used in assessing proposals and making funding decisions. The Peer Review Framework document is available here : https://www.ukri.org/funding/peer-review/.